A large pile of assorted trash, including plastic bottles, bags, furniture, and household items, sits outdoors under a blue sky. The Inside Climate News logo appears at the bottom center.

Dumped, Not Recycled?

Electronic Tracking Raises Questions About Houston’s Drive to Repurpose a Full Range of Plastics

Revelations by a watchdog group reinforce doubts about chemical recycling, a technology promoted by the city in a collaboration with ExxonMobil and other companies

“All plastic, all numbers, all symbols,” proclaims one sign at the recycling site in Houston’s suburban Kingwood community, referring to the seven standard types of plastics, commonly identified on a plastic product by a number inside a “chasing arrows” icon. “Bag it and bring it,” reads another.

The goal is to boost the dismal plastic recycling rates in Houston, which are thought to be even lower than the national average of 6 percent, and—however paradoxically—turn this petrochemical and plastics manufacturing hub into a model of responsibility for other cities struggling with that problem. But the effort is opaque, and dogged by contradictions. Environmentalists fret that scaling up chemical recycling could add to the pollution burden of Houston’s low-income and minority communities and prove a successful ploy to entrench the nation’s fossil fuel economy.

There are multiple warning signs. On Tuesday, the environmental groups Beyond Plastics and the International Pollutants Elimination Network issued a report documenting decades-old challenges to the chemical recycling of plastics. Titled “Chemical Recycling: A Dangerous Deception,” the 159-page paper identifies 11 chemical recycling plants in the United States that were at least partly operating as of September, often with government support.

The challenges at those plants include a low output of recycled plastics; the production of hazardous waste like toxic chemicals and heavy metals; fires and oil spills at production units; and questions of commercial viability, the report said. The technology “has failed for decades, continues to fail, and there is no evidence that it will contribute to resolving the plastics pollution crisis,” the two advocacy groups conclude.

Read the full story in Inside Climate News.

IPEN (國際污染物消除網絡)
私隱概覽

呢個網站會用 Cookie ,噉我哋就可以為你提供最佳嘅使用者體驗。 Cookie 資料會儲存喺你嘅瀏覽器,並且執行功能,例如喺你返去我哋嘅網站嗰陣識別你,同埋幫助我哋嘅團隊瞭解你覺得網站嘅邊啲部分最有趣同有用。.